Moral Guilt is Worthless
Well, I've published (kind of) three books inside of a year. Raucous Reckonings is finally published. The entire Harmogenics series is complete.
This book is wilder than the previous ones. Recklessly bold in places. One of the most shocking claims I make is that everyone should live a guilt-free life. Moral guilt is worthless.
I do live a guilt-free life.
WTF?
Psychopath! Narcissist! Moral monster!
Yeah, I know. That's the reflex. And I understand it. Guilt feels so deeply woven into morality that suggesting we drop it sounds like suggesting we drop morality itself. It sounds dangerous, antisocial, maybe even evil.
But that reflex is exactly the problem. And here's why.
There's nothing wrong with religion.
Religion wasn't a mistake. It wasn't mass delusion. It did real work for human beings living in conditions we can barely imagine now. One of the things it did, very effectively, was bind moral guilt to behavior and, in turn, into the human psyche as an emotion.
That wasn't sinister. It was necessary. Guilt became so embedded we can barely separate it from what we call conscience.
Thousands of years ago, humans lived in small, violent, unstable groups with limited coordination and no sophisticated ethical systems. You couldn't rely on reflective empathy or nuanced moral reasoning. You needed an internal brake. Guilt provided it.
Moral guilt was primitive but functional. It helped keep tribes intact. It reduced chaos. It internalized restraint when external enforcement was weak or nonexistent. In that context, guilt earned its keep.
The problem is that guilt isn't a basic emotion like love or fear. It is no more an emotion than anxiety or paranoia. It's a state constructed by our powerful imagination.
We assembled it from narrative, repetition, and self-surveillance and took it to heart. And because we assembled it, because it feels so visceral and real, because we took it to heart, we won't let it go. It is literally felt as an emotion. You can't get much more basic than that. Nevertheless, nothing's permanent, and we keep treating this psychological artifact as if it's fundamental to being human.
Moral guilt serves no useful purpose anymore.
What was adaptive became entrenched. What was useful hardened into doctrine. What was developmental got mistaken for eternal necessity. That's not conspiracy, that's emergence. Old tools persist long after the environment that required them has disappeared.
And for most of human history, ethics and morality were the same thing. The first ethical principles were all moral - bound to shame, purity, cosmic order, salvation, metaphysical condemnation. You couldn't separate "what you should do" from "what makes you good or bad in the eyes of God or the tribe." That fusion made sense. It was the only framework available.
Fast forward to now.
We live in a world of legal systems, psychology, neuroscience, global interdependence, and increasingly explicit ethical reasoning. Courts don't function on metaphysical condemnation. They function on evidence, proportionality, harm assessment. Medicine doesn't ask whether you're sinful. Engineering doesn't care about purity.
This is where ethics begins to decouple from morality. Perhaps science and growth in civilization today are tied to this decoupling.
Ethics today is operational. What happened. Who was harmed. What restores balance. What prevents recurrence. Not a moral drama. A systems problem. And systems problems don't need guilt. They need efficiency or, at least, capability.
Book One addresses how useful I find the psychological growth model of Spiral Dynamics. I mention this because where ethics becomes distinct from morality (as in the case of divorce in the western world, for example) marks the real entry point of the Orange (rational) psychological stage. Stop arguing about cosmic blame. Figure out how things work and make them work better. No mysticism required. No shame rituals needed. Just attention, evidence, best practices.
From this perspective, guilt doesn't look sacred. It looks antique-ish and in need of maintenance.
Guilt and shame consume enormous psychological energy and return almost nothing. Guilt doesn't reliably improve behavior. It freezes identity in the past. It encourages self-absorption masquerading as virtue. It amplifies anxiety, depression, burnout, relapse, paralysis. And it spreads socially through projection and guilt-tripping, degrading relationships while pretending to defend morality.
Yet, ethical and legal responsibility still exists. Legal guilt still exists. Recognition of the Other still exists. In fact, it becomes clearer. People, rather than your guilt, are what matter. You don't harm people. They deserve civility. Your fear of condemnation is clearly of secondary importance here. Suddenly, you adjust behavior because it works, not because you fear suffering.
Religion could survive this transition fine if it let go of guilt as a primary lever. Meaning, ritual, humility, awe, transcendence, community - all still available. What breaks is the ancient control mechanism.
Amber and Red people, most people, won't allow this shift because their sense of order depends on shame, hierarchy, punishment. Remove guilt and they assume chaos follows. They can't see that ethics has grown teeth of its own.
But the world has already moved on in Constant Becoming.
This isn't anti-religious. It's developmental. Guilt helped us survive. Ethics helps us function. And living without guilt doesn't mean living without responsibility.
It means living without dragging a Bronze Age psychological tool through a twenty-first-century nervous system and calling the damage virtue.
And guilt does damage. Real damage. I show this in Raucous Reckonings - guilt is as bad for your health and well-being as smoking in some ways. It degrades your nervous system, your immune function, your capacity for clear thinking. It's not metaphorically toxic, it's physiologically toxic.
Plus, there is a great bonus feature of dropping guilt. When you stop running that loop, playing that very old, antiquated life game, it frees up an amazing amount of mental energy. Very suddenly, a big chunk of The Weight is gone.
It might hit you as a sudden, surprising calm. Like a background noise you didn't know was there just shut off. You realize how much attention was getting burned on self-monitoring, self-condemnation, internal prosecution. Now that capacity is just... available.
Or it might hit you as disorientation. Oh my god, what do I do with myself? If I'm not guilty, if I'm not working off some cosmic debt, what am I even doing? That vertigo is real. You've been using guilt as ballast, as a kind of identity anchor, and now it's gone.
Either way, the energy is real. And it doesn't just sit there. It moves. It becomes available for attention, for learning, for actually engaging with what's in front of you instead of what you think you deserve to feel.
Use it.
And smile.
Comments